Solutions

MuleSoft
and integration

Integration is where implementations get expensive and where they most often stall. The important question is rarely which tool — it is whether this genuinely needs a platform, or whether it needs one well-built connection.

Typical starting points

  • Systems that will not talk and nobody owns it
  • An integration platform bought and underused
  • Nightly exports standing in for real-time data
  • A project stalled on a data problem

What it solves

Your systems disagree and everyone works around it

Every business past a certain size runs on systems that were never designed to meet. The cost is not the software — it is the people quietly reconciling it.

The nightly export is load-bearing

A file drops at 2am and half the business depends on it. When it fails, people find out from customers.

Point-to-point connections have multiplied

Each one built for a reason, none documented, and changing any system now means auditing all of them.

The same data is entered repeatedly

Because connecting the systems was quoted once and deferred, and re-keying became somebody’s job description.

Nobody owns the middle

Integrations belong to whoever built them, who has usually left. Failures surface as business problems first.

The platform was bought and underused

Significant licensing, a fraction of the intended use, and a renewal conversation approaching.

Real-time is promised and batch is delivered

Expectations set during the sales cycle that the architecture never actually supported.

Specialties

What we implement on MuleSoft

We do not start with the product. We start with the problem, then use only what solves it.

Integration assessment

What genuinely needs connecting, how often, and whether a platform is warranted at all.

API design

Interfaces built to be reused, so the next project is cheaper than this one.

Point-to-point integration

Where one well-built connection is the right answer and a platform would be overhead.

Legacy system connection

Systems with partial APIs, odd file formats, or considerably more history than documentation.

Data migration

Moving history between systems without losing the parts that carry meaning.

Error handling and monitoring

Knowing an integration failed before a customer tells you.

Documentation and handover

Written down and owned, so the next person is not archaeology-dependent.

Rescue and rationalisation

Taking on an estate of undocumented connections and making it safe to change.

Our process

You see working software long before go-live

The same shape on every engagement, sized to the business. Each stage produces something you can look at and react to, rather than a document you approve and hope for.

01

Discovery

We learn how your business runs before we touch the org — including the parts that are not on Salesforce yet.

02

Blueprint

Scope agreed and locked, priorities set, and a phased plan that says plainly what is not happening in phase one.

03

Build in phases

Regular demos of real, working configuration — so course corrections happen while they are still cheap.

04

Deploy and enable

Migration, testing, cutover and training owned by us — adoption is part of the job, not an afterthought.

05

Beyond go-live

The same team stays. Go-live is where the value starts compounding, not where the relationship ends.

Integrations

The systems that most often need joining

Integration work is defined by what is on either end. These are the categories that come up most.

ERP and finance

Usually the system of record, and usually the hardest to reach.
NetSuite  ·  SAP  ·  Sage  ·  Acumatica  ·  Epicor

Industry platforms

Sector systems with partial APIs, or none.
Procore  ·  Sage 300 CRE  ·  Epicor

Data platforms

Warehouses and lakes that need feeding and reading.
Snowflake  ·  BigQuery  ·  Databricks

Commerce and ordering

Order capture reaching fulfilment without manual steps.
Shopify  ·  EDI  ·  Punchout

Identity

Single sign-on and provisioning across the estate.
Okta  ·  Entra ID

Files and legacy exchange

The formats nobody chose but everybody still uses.
SFTP  ·  Flat file  ·  XML  ·  Fixed-width

Client stories

Integration in the wild

Software and digital signage

Wand Digital

Vendor portals logged into and re-keyed by hand every week. Automated integrations with Ingram Micro and BlueStar handle PO processing, serial number tracking and shipping notifications — recovering 30 to 60 minutes per employee per week.
Ingram Micro  ·  BlueStar  ·  BigCommerce

Statewide education nonprofit

MI Talent Together

An early MuleSoft attempt proved more than the team could maintain. We recommended stepping back to a right-sized Experience Cloud portal instead — the honest answer being that this needed a connection, not a platform.
MuleSoft — replaced  ·  Experience Cloud  ·  Sales Cloud

Consumer products

Crane USA

B2B sales and B2C service unified on one platform, with accounting and carrier systems connected so orders, shipments and invoices reconcile without a manual step in between.
QuickBooks (Autofy)  ·  UPS & USPS  ·  Sales Cloud

Let's talk about what actually needs connecting

Not a cookie-cutter demo. A conversation about which systems disagree, how much it costs you, and an honest read on whether this needs a platform or a connection.
or call (773) 888-7900
icon-angle icon-bars icon-times